Loading...
Loading...
Mabl Alternative
Mabl pioneered low-code testing but still relies on DOM selectors under the hood. Yalitest uses true computer vision — no selectors at all, no DOM dependency, no silent failures.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Mabl | Yalitest |
|---|---|---|
| AI approach | DOM-based with AI healing | True computer vision — no DOM |
| Test authoring | Low-code recorder + editor | Plain English descriptions |
| Self-healing | Selector fallbacks | Vision-based — no selectors to heal |
| Pricing | Enterprise pricing (custom) | Free during beta, transparent tiers at GA |
| Setup | Chrome extension + config | Paste URL — nothing to install |
| Open approach | Proprietary platform | CI/CD native, API-first |
Key differences
Mabl still reads the DOM and heals broken selectors. Yalitest never reads the DOM — it sees your app like a human user.
Mabl requires recording interactions in a Chrome extension. Yalitest takes plain English — no clicking through flows to create tests.
Mabl requires contacting sales. Yalitest publishes pricing tiers and offers free beta access to everyone.
Migration
Sign up for Yalitest early access
Export your Mabl test descriptions
Recreate tests using plain English on Yalitest
Compare test results side by side
Transition when confident in coverage
Free during beta. No credit card. No selectors to maintain.
Request Early Access